<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ★ Ubuntu Studio as my new main OS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://calmblog.kingbrick.co.uk/2009/08/ubuntu-studio/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://calmblog.kingbrick.co.uk/2009/08/ubuntu-studio</link>
	<description>Web design, technology, music and sarcasm</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:33:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firefox hunting &#8211; madnessJack</title>
		<link>http://calmblog.kingbrick.co.uk/2009/08/ubuntu-studio#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Firefox hunting &#8211; madnessJack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 20:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingbrick.co.uk/madnessjack/?p=60#comment-11</guid>
		<description>[...] why I think it does). I thought that the slow Firefox start was Microsoft&#8217;s fault but since migrating to Ubuntu Linux I&#8217;ve found this not to be the case and I&#8217;ve no idea who let the Ubuntu version look [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] why I think it does). I thought that the slow Firefox start was Microsoft&#8217;s fault but since migrating to Ubuntu Linux I&#8217;ve found this not to be the case and I&#8217;ve no idea who let the Ubuntu version look [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windows and Ubuntu Linux aesthetics and fonts &#124; madnessJack</title>
		<link>http://calmblog.kingbrick.co.uk/2009/08/ubuntu-studio#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows and Ubuntu Linux aesthetics and fonts &#124; madnessJack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingbrick.co.uk/madnessjack/?p=60#comment-10</guid>
		<description>[...] I was saying earlier one of the biggest changes I&#8217;ve had to make is getting used to how ugly Ubuntu is compared to Windows. When I saw screenshots of the standard Jaunty install I could&#8217;ve easily [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I was saying earlier one of the biggest changes I&#8217;ve had to make is getting used to how ugly Ubuntu is compared to Windows. When I saw screenshots of the standard Jaunty install I could&#8217;ve easily [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://calmblog.kingbrick.co.uk/2009/08/ubuntu-studio#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 09:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingbrick.co.uk/madnessjack/?p=60#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Oh it isn&#039;t as bad as I&#039;m making out. I&#039;ve had a play and I use Arial and similar at a smaller size. I can live with it :-)

The rasterisation, aliasing and especially the kerning of fonts is nowhere near the standard that Microsoft ships. On Macs the kerning is faultless but the aliasing is similarly blurry. They get around it in an arty way so it looks good. I&#039;ve noticed it on PDFs a lot too. I guess Microsoft has the upper hand with the billions of dollars of research.

It&#039;s not Ubuntu&#039;s fault, I&#039;m such a spoilt brat and I like to have a paddy when something isn&#039;t perfect :-P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh it isn&#8217;t as bad as I&#8217;m making out. I&#8217;ve had a play and I use Arial and similar at a smaller size. I can live with it :-)</p>
<p>The rasterisation, aliasing and especially the kerning of fonts is nowhere near the standard that Microsoft ships. On Macs the kerning is faultless but the aliasing is similarly blurry. They get around it in an arty way so it looks good. I&#8217;ve noticed it on PDFs a lot too. I guess Microsoft has the upper hand with the billions of dollars of research.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not Ubuntu&#8217;s fault, I&#8217;m such a spoilt brat and I like to have a paddy when something isn&#8217;t perfect :-P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://calmblog.kingbrick.co.uk/2009/08/ubuntu-studio#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 09:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingbrick.co.uk/madnessjack/?p=60#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Oh it isn&#039;t as bad as I&#039;m making out. I&#039;ve had a play and I use Arial and similar at a smaller size. I can live with it :-)

The rasterisation, aliasing and especially the kerning of fonts is nowhere near the standard that Microsoft ships. On Macs the kerning is faultless but the aliasing is similarly blurry. They get around it in an arty way so it looks good. I&#039;ve noticed it on PDFs a lot too. I guess Microsoft has the upper hand with the billions of dollars of research.

It&#039;s not Ubuntu&#039;s fault, I&#039;m such a spoilt brat and I like to have a paddy when something isn&#039;t perfect :-P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh it isn&#8217;t as bad as I&#8217;m making out. I&#8217;ve had a play and I use Arial and similar at a smaller size. I can live with it :-)</p>
<p>The rasterisation, aliasing and especially the kerning of fonts is nowhere near the standard that Microsoft ships. On Macs the kerning is faultless but the aliasing is similarly blurry. They get around it in an arty way so it looks good. I&#8217;ve noticed it on PDFs a lot too. I guess Microsoft has the upper hand with the billions of dollars of research.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not Ubuntu&#8217;s fault, I&#8217;m such a spoilt brat and I like to have a paddy when something isn&#8217;t perfect :-P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joeb454</title>
		<link>http://calmblog.kingbrick.co.uk/2009/08/ubuntu-studio#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Joeb454</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 00:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingbrick.co.uk/madnessjack/?p=60#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the tagging ;)

As for the font&#039;s - personally I think you should just have a play on some of them. I don&#039;t find them to be an issue at all - hell I&#039;ve even written magazine articles and reviewed books in my Ubuntu system. They can&#039;t be that bad!

As for looks, I&#039;ll try to remember to take a screenshot of my install for you, and see what you think. If you haven&#039;t got it by Sunday, ping me and let me know ;)

Your good mate - Joe Barker :-P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the tagging ;)</p>
<p>As for the font&#8217;s &#8211; personally I think you should just have a play on some of them. I don&#8217;t find them to be an issue at all &#8211; hell I&#8217;ve even written magazine articles and reviewed books in my Ubuntu system. They can&#8217;t be that bad!</p>
<p>As for looks, I&#8217;ll try to remember to take a screenshot of my install for you, and see what you think. If you haven&#8217;t got it by Sunday, ping me and let me know ;)</p>
<p>Your good mate &#8211; Joe Barker :-P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joeb454</title>
		<link>http://calmblog.kingbrick.co.uk/2009/08/ubuntu-studio#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Joeb454</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 00:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kingbrick.co.uk/madnessjack/?p=60#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the tagging ;)

As for the font&#039;s - personally I think you should just have a play on some of them. I don&#039;t find them to be an issue at all - hell I&#039;ve even written magazine articles and reviewed books in my Ubuntu system. They can&#039;t be that bad!

As for looks, I&#039;ll try to remember to take a screenshot of my install for you, and see what you think. If you haven&#039;t got it by Sunday, ping me and let me know ;)

Your good mate - Joe Barker :-P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the tagging ;)</p>
<p>As for the font&#8217;s &#8211; personally I think you should just have a play on some of them. I don&#8217;t find them to be an issue at all &#8211; hell I&#8217;ve even written magazine articles and reviewed books in my Ubuntu system. They can&#8217;t be that bad!</p>
<p>As for looks, I&#8217;ll try to remember to take a screenshot of my install for you, and see what you think. If you haven&#8217;t got it by Sunday, ping me and let me know ;)</p>
<p>Your good mate &#8211; Joe Barker :-P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

